Gamble & Ghevaert

Posts Tagged ‘same sex parents’

Indian surrogacy reforms – what’s the latest for gay dads and others?

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2013

There has been press coverage over the past couple of days about the new Indian surrogacy laws blocking gay dads from accessing surrogacy in India. It is an issue which has been brewing for a while, with a Bill lurking in the Indian Parliament for the past two years designed to regulate the Indian surrogacy industry and to stop foreign parents conceiving children they can’t take home. The changes affect all foreign parents considering surrogacy in India, but hit gay dads particularly hard.

Although the new draft Indian law itself has not yet been enacted, it seems that it is being brought into force by the back door. The Indian authorities have started requiring foreign parents obtain a ‘medical visa’ to travel to India for the purposes of engaging in a surrogacy arrangement (and this covers trips involving any treatment, including leaving sperm samples).

What has happened this week, as reported in the Times of India, is that Indian surrogacy clinics have been notified that they must register with the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and ensure their foreign patients have the visa before giving any treatment. Surrogacy clinics are, in other words, being given responsibility for enforcing the new visa requirements.

What are the new requirements?
In practice, UK parents are in a better position than those in other countries where surrogacy is not recognised at all, but gay dads and unmarried couples will not be eligible. To get the medical visa for surrogacy in India, the Indian authorities say that:

1. The parents must be a man and woman, married for at least 2 years.

2. The parents’ home embassy must provide a letter confirming that their country recognises surrogacy and that any child born will be entitled to enter the parents’ home country. The British High Commission has helpfully issued a letter for this purpose which is available on their website here.

3. The couple must undertake to care for the child.

4. The clinic must be recognized by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).

5. The couple must have a notarised surrogacy agreement with their surrogate mother.

6. The couple must be informed that they need an exit visa under Indian law to take their child out of India after the birth and, to get that, they must have taken custody of their child and discharged all their responsibilities as per their surrogacy agreement.

So what now?
Many parents we work with go to the US for surrogacy, where there is a much more established legal framework which is supportive of all types of families and of surrogacy generally. For those with a more limited budget, the UK is probably the safest option, albeit that it has its own challenges. Other international destinations (places like the Ukraine) are likely to revive as a result of these changes in India.

Parents contemplating international surrogacy also need to bear in mind that, even without these new Indian law issues, international surrogacy law is complicated and that the UK legal position does not automatically reflect the law in the destination country. There is more information about the UK legal issues associated with international surrogacy on our website.

NGA in the news – Gay sperm donor pays maintenance for ‘his’ children

Monday, October 29th, 2012

The Guardian has reported the case of NGA client Mark Langridge, who donated his sperm to a lesbian couple who conceived two children in 1998 and 2000. More than a decade on, the lesbian mothers have split and Mark is being pursued by the CSA for maintenance.

Having been advised by NGA solicitor Sarah Wood-Heath, Mark spoke out in the Guardian’s Saturday Money section about the unfairness of the law in holding him financially responsible. The article also quotes Natalie, who was interviewed this week on the story on BBC Radio 5 Live and BBC Radio London.

As specialist lawyers who have advised on cases like these for many years (including the case of Andy Bathie, which received worldwide press coverage back in 2008), we know that the law on this is black and white – whether you are financially responsible depends on whether you are legally the ‘father’.

A sperm donor is the legal father, whether or not he appears on the birth certificate, unless:

- he donates his sperm through a licensed clinic (without planning an ongoing role if he knows the recipients), or
- he donates to a married couple, or
- he donates, after April 2009, to a lesbian couple who are civil partners.

In all other cases (including private donations to single women, unmarried couples and lesbian couples before April 2009) there is no financial protection for sperm donors. It often shocks people to learn that any verbal or written agreement that the donor would have no financial responsibility is completely irrelevant.

Should the law be changed? Mark Langridge certainly thinks so. The law is particularly cruel in his case, since in 1998 and 2000 it would have been difficult for him to have donated to the mothers via a clinic to give him financial protection, and the law did not then (as it now does) hold both lesbian mothers legally and financially responsible.

The key message to others has to be to take great care before acting as a private donor. Make sure you structure things to protect yourself (by only donating to a married/civilly partnered couple or via a clinic) or at the very least that you understand the risk you are taking. There is more on our website about being a known sperm donor.

Same sex partners to be named on birth certificates from tomorrow

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Natalie Gamble was interviewed on the BBC Radio 5 Live Breakfast Show this morning about the new rights for same sex partners to be named on the birth certificates of children they conceive together.

For lesbian couples, new rules allow the non birth mother to be named as the child’s other parent if the couple conceive through donor insemination or IVF together. Although the law change came into force on 6 April 2009, it only applies to children conceived after that date. The government has calculated that, allowing for some early arrivals, this means the soonest a child could be born under the new rules is 1 September 2009. From tomorrow, therefore, registrars around the UK will be prepped and ready to register births showing two women as a child’s parents.

On the Radio 5 Breakfast Show, Natalie was also asked whether gay men could also be named on birth certificates together. As Natalie explained, gay men conceiving with a surrogate mother will be able to obtain a birth certificate showing them both as parents, but that the changes for gay couples are coming into effect later. Gay men, like heterosexual couples, will have to apply to court for a reissue of the birth certificate after a surrogacy birth. They will be able to make such applications from 6 April 2010 although, unlike the new rules for lesbian couples, applications can be made for children born before the law changed.

We welcome the changes to both the donor conception and surrogacy rules to cover gay and lesbian parents. The move represents an important step forward in recognising gay and lesbian families, and ensuring that two parents who commit to having a child together are both legally recognised as being responsible for that child.

More information on lesbian conception law from our website.

More information on surrogacy law from our website.