Gamble & Ghevaert

New HFEA rules on surrogacy come into force today

October 1st, 2013

The HFEA’s new Code of Practice, which comes into force today, contains new guidance for UK fertility clinics dealing with surrogacy cases.  The changes affect how clinics deal with the forms which allocate legal parenthood in surrogacy cases.

Cases where the surrogate is married or in a civil partnership

If the surrogate is married or in a civil partnership, she and her husband (or civil partner) will be the legal parents of the child.  There may be some rare cases in which the surrogate’s spouse does not consent to the arrangement as a question of fact (for example if the couple are separated) and in such cases the clinic should obtain evidence of this by asking the surrogate mother to complete and sign Form LC.  However, in the vast majority of cases a surrogate’s spouse cannot simply opt out of becoming a legal parent by signing a withdrawal of consent form.

The HFEA gives new guidance making this clear, and instructions to clinics about how the paperwork should be completed.

Cases where the surrogate is not married

If the surrogate is legally single (or if her spouse genuinely does not consent), there is new guidance on what clinics should do.  The HFEA no longer says that in these circumstances the child has no second legal parent.  Instead, the new rules provide that there are choices to be made as to who can be named on the child’s first birth certificate with the surrogate mother (something which brings the HFEA guidance into line with the approach of the family courts and register offices).

In practice, there are three options and clinics will need to consider the alternatives carefully with patients before treatment proceeds:

1) Do nothing – the intended (biological) father will be the legal father and can be named on the birth certificate with the surrogate.  No parenthood election forms need be signed.

2) Nominate the intended mother as the other parent.  The clinic will need to ensure that the new the parenthood election forms for surrogacy (Forms SWP and SPP) are signed by both women before conception.  This enables the two women to be named on the birth certificate together when the child is born.

3) Nominate a non-biological father as the father (e.g. the other dad in a gay couple or, probably more rarely, an intended father in a case where a couple is conceiving with the intended mother’s eggs and donor sperm).  The clinic will need to ensure the parenthood election forms (SWP and SPP) are signed by the nominated non-biological father and the surrogate mother before conception.  The non-biological dad can then be registered on the birth certificate with the surrogate.

The parenthood election forms are critical documents which patients will need when they go and register their child’s birth, so it is important that licensed centres provide patients with a copy and keep a copy on file.  They must be signed before artificial insemination or embryo transfer to be legally effective.

Intended parents will still need to apply for a parental order after their child is born to secure their joint parentage and to extinguish their surrogate’s legal responsibilites.  This will, in the long run, give the intended parents a birth certificate naming them both as the parents - the new HFEA rules only deal with the interim position before this process is complete.  It is therefore also important that licensed centres are familiar with parental orders, or otherwise make sure their patients have legal advice.

There is more information and FAQs from the HFEA here and more information about legal parenthood after surrogacy on our website.  We have assisted the HFEA with its new guidance, and have worked with hundreds of families created through surrogacy.  We can offer training to licensed centres, and advice and support to families with navigating these new rules.

 

European Court of Justice – should mothers through surrogacy have a right to maternity leave?

September 30th, 2013

The European Court of Justice has given conflicting opinions in two cases concerning whether European mothers through surrogacy should be entitled to maternity leave.

In the first case, the Advocate General (adviser to the court) said that a UK mother should be given maternity leave and that she should share her entitlement with her surrogate mother.  The intended mother was employed at an NHS hospital and had a baby through surrogacy who she cared for – and breastfed – from birth, before she was granted a parental order by the UK family court giving her legal responsibility as a parent.  The ECJ preliminary opinion was that she had been discriminated against under EU law by being denied maternity leave rights.

In the second case, from Ireland, a different Advocate General expressed a different view.  In this case, a mother who worked as a teacher with a child born through surrogacy in California was not discriminated against by having been denied the right to maternity leave.  The adviser to the court said that whether Ireland should extend the scope of maternity leave to cover mothers through surrogacy was a matter for the Irish Parliament.

The differences are on the face of it puzzling given the factual similarities between the cases, particularly with the opinions given virtually simultaneously.  However, each case was argued under different parts of European anti-discrimination law, and there was a key difference in that Ireland does not allow for surrogacy, whereas UK law does.

As far as UK parents are concerned, the UK government has in any event recently announced its decision to extend maternity rights to parents through surrogacy, and is in the process of changing UK law through the Children and Families Bill.  It is something we have been campaigning for for more than five years, and we are proud to have contributed to the new legislation (more information about this here).  The new law is currently completing its passage through the House of Lords and is expected to come into force in 2015.  UK law will then apply equal rights for parents through surrogacy, with both straight and gay couples permitted to claim paid time off work to take care of their newborn children.

In the meantime, and until the new UK legislation come into force in 2015, the ECJ opinion will give futher support to any parents denied leave who wish to bring discrimination claims against their employers.

Hague Convention to regulate international surrogacy?

September 24th, 2013

The Hague Conference on Private International Law is considering a new global convention on international surrogacy. This follows previous international Hague Conventions regulating inter-country adoption and international child abduction, and marks a response to the blossoming of global surrogacy over the last five years.

To help the Hague with its investigations, experienced surrogacy law practitioners from across the globe (including Natalie Gamble Associates) have been asked to give evidence to give a picture of what is actually happening on the ground, and the problems arising in practice.  Submissions are due by 30 September.

Our experience

Our evidence to the Hague paints an interesting picture of the cross-border surrogacy arrangements being entered into by UK parents (both those living in Britain and abroad).  Over the past four years, we have worked with 227 families in cross-border surrogacy cases, covering children born in 19 different countries to married and unmarried heterosexual parents, same sex parents, and single mums and dads. Most have been commercially arranged gestational surrogacy arrangements (the majority involving donated eggs), but there has also been a significant minority of family arrangements, including some traditional surrogacy cases where the surrogate is the biological mother. The costs for parents have ranged from a few hundred pounds up to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The most popular surrogacy destination countries for UK parents are the USA, India and the Ukraine.  It will be interesting to see how this experience compares with surrogacy lawyers from other countries.

All the international surrogacy cases we have dealt with have involved conflict of law problems, since the very first international surrogacy case in which Ukrainian-born twins were famously declared ‘stateless and parentless’ by the UK High Court in 2008 (because Ukrainian law said our clients were the legal parents, and UK law said the Ukrainian surrogate and her husband were the legal parents).  Since then, we have worked with 45 further families to obtain parental orders to resolve similar problems following international surrogacy arrangements (including our six further published cases which have made new law) with other parents representing themselves and more cases currently in the pipeline.  Parents will be reassured to know that we have not seen any parental order applications refused, or any children ultimately denied entry to the UK.

But five years down the line from that first landmark Ukrainian case, UK families continue to be stuck abroad for a significant period of time after the birth and to face a long and often complex UK court process. Some of the families we have advised have not been eligible to apply for a parental order (or have chosen not to do so) which means they are caring for their children without secure legal status, something which concerns us greatly.

Our view on what the Hague should do

The focus of any international regulation should be to recognise the right people as the legal parents internationally, so that children can be brought home promptly after the birth by the parents who conceived them, and no children are left in an unresolved legal position.

The Hague should also seek to ensure the quality of intermediaries (surrogacy agencies and clinics) to ensure that surrogate mothers and parents are fully informed, protected and supported.  This will create the strongest platform for protecting the welfare of yet-to-be conceived children, and reduce the risk of exploitation of surrogate mothers and intended parents, particularly in third world countries like India.  The issue of payments to surrogate mothers should be considered in the context of ensuring that surrogates give full and informed consent.

Onerous vetting of intended parents should be avoided. Surrogacy is a form of reproduction, and it would be entirely inappropriate to require parents seeking to conceive their own children to follow the procedures used to approve inter-country adopters. Particular care should also be taken to protect the human rights of non-traditional families (such as single and same sex parents). Research evidence shows that it is the quality of parenting which matters for child welfare, rather than the family form, and so any regulation of international surrogacy should be neutral, and should not be used to apply moral positions concerning who should and should not become a parent.

We know from long experience how resolute intended parents are in their longing to have a family.  They are prepared to grapple with significant legal and logistical challenges (and in some countries even criminal restrictions) to conceive through international surrogacy. It is therefore important that any international regulation of surrogacy is pragmatic.  Rather than fruitlessly seeking to curb surrogacy generally, any new convention should instead focus on creating a workable international system for surrogacy which protects all involved, and particularly the children.

What happens next?

The Hague is just in the early stages of gathering information, and it is likely to be years before any new convention comes into force.  However, this is important work and it is critical that those who have real experience of surrogacy get involved and help shape any future regulation as the discussion proceeds.  We will stay closely involved and keep you updated with developments.

In the meantime, the deadline for submissions from legal practitioners is 30 September.  If you are a lawyer with experience in international surrogacy, we would urge you to complete a questionnaire and have your say  http://www.hcch.net/limesurvey/index.php/519183/lang-en

There is more information about international surrogacy law on our website, and you can read our published international surrogacy judgments here.

NGA at the Alternative Parenting Show 2013

September 23rd, 2013

Our team had a great day exhibiting at this year’s Alternative Parenting Show on Saturday.  The popular show – which has been running for 3 years – is held in central London and is often a first port of call for parents looking for information about building families in alternative ways.  We were there representing the leading legal work that Natalie Gamble Associates has done for alternative families over many years, on same sex parenting, international surrogacy and fertility law.  It was great to meet so many parents-to-be with questions about their situations, and to catch up with other leaders in the field, including Stonewall, the London Women’s Clinic, PrideAngel, New Family Social, the Donor Conception Network, and the HFEA.

There was also a lot of interest in our new non profit making sister agency Brilliant Beginnings, with a buzz around the hall and discussion in the seminars about the new option for UK intended parents and the changes Brilliant Beginnings is fighting for.  The seminars (on surrogacy, adoption, donor conception and fertility treatment) were also a great source of information for parents planning families, with various NGA legal cases explained.

There was a really great energy – as always – about alternative families of all shapes and sizes.  Every year the APS makes us reflect on how far we have come since we started working in this field, and how positive the landscape now is for everyone who wants to create a family.  Roll on the APS 2014…

You can see more photos on our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/nataliegambleassociates

There is more information about the law for gay dads, lesbian mums and single mums and single dads on our website.

NGA hosts House of Commons reception to celebrate the grant of maternity leave rights for surrogacy

September 12th, 2013

Big BenWe were thrilled to host a reception at the Houses of Parliament on Tuesday evening to celebrate the change to UK law giving parents through surrogacy rights to maternity leave and pay.

NGA co-hosted the reception with John Healey MP, and it was attended by the Minister for Equality Jo Swinson, key UK professionals and influencers, and the parents who have worked with us for so long in different ways to make this change happen.  It was wonderful to see so many children and parents, and a testament to how important this change is for real families.

Natalie, John and the Minister spoke about the landmark Children and Families Bill, which from 2015 will give parents through surrogacy the same rights to time off work to care for their newborn children as other UK parents.  It represents a legal recognition, for the first time, that intended parents are responsible for their children from birth.  We know well that new parents through surrogacy can be in a vulnerable position, whether because they have not been able to have their children in the way they had hoped, or because they are same sex parents anxious about whether their family will be accepted.  That vulnerability is made worse by the lack of parental recognition UK law applies when their children are born.  The change giving maternity rights is therefore a huge step forward, and not just for its practical effect, but for the message it sends.

But there is more to do, and we want to see full legal recognition of surrogacy families, beyond just the right to time off work when their child is born.  Brilliant Beginnings’ surrogacy campaigning was launched publicly at the event, with Natalie advocating the need for further change and explaining what Brilliant Beginnings will be doing to make that happen.  You can read more about our call for change on the Brilliant Beginnings blog.

Honesty best policy in divorce and dissolution proceedings

September 5th, 2013

The Telegraph recently reported a divorce case where an agreed financial settlement reached between a husband and wife was set aside. In a rare move, the court decided that the wife had not been provided with the full details from her husband about his financial wealth and the deal reached should therefore be overturned. The case serves as an important reminder of the importance financial disclosure and honesty when dealing with a relationship breakdown.

At NGA we deal with divorces, dissolutions and other relationship breakdowns, working with couples in a range of family structures.  But whatever your family structure, this case shows how criticial it is to be honest in any court proceedings or private agreements, if your relationship has broken down.

It is a long standing principle in divorce and civil partnership dissolution cases that there must be full and frank disclosure of the parties’ financial circumstances. This is essential to reach a fair and appropriate settlement.  Where there has not been full and frank disclosure and this is later discovered, it may be possible for a spouse to apply retrospectively to court to set aside or vary the settlement. This is exactly what happened in this case. Whilst set aside applications are rare they have been granted in circumstances where there has been a failure to disclose the full financial picture.

In this case the husband and wife divorced in 2009 and reached a private settlement. The wife later discovered that her husband had not been truthful about the true extent of his assets with over a million pounds in investments not being declared. Notably, the wife did not have proper legal advice before agreeing to the settlement, and this highlights how having the right legal support from a solicitor can be invaluable in ensuring that any settlement is reasonable.The wife may now be awardedmore money but the full circumstances of the case will need to be considered first, causing delay and uncertainty.

If you are going through your own relationship breakdown and would like more information about how we can help please contact Richard Perrins at contact us on 0844 357 1602 .There is more information about our services here.

NGA launches surrogacy and egg donation agency, Brilliant Beginnings

August 29th, 2013

brilliant beginnings logoThis is a précis of a longer piece Helen and Natalie have written for Bionews, which you can read in full here.

We at Natalie Gamble Associates have been pressing for a better framework for UK surrogacy for some time.  We live in a globalised world in which commercial surrogacy is a reality. If parents cannot build their family in the UK, they will, and do, look abroad to countries (like India, the Ukraine and the USA) which provide commercial surrogacy and egg donation services. There are some exceptional surrogacy support organisations in the UK which operate through the efforts of committed volunteers, such as Surrogacy UK. But UK law restricts proper resourcing for agencies, limits advertising (which in a global market means that foreign agencies overshadow UK providers), prohibits enforceable agreements and defers any legal process until after the child is born.

We are launching a new non-profit making UK surrogacy and egg donation agency, Brilliant Beginnings, which will help create UK families through surrogacy and egg donation, and will reinvest resources into campaigns to promote change and raise awareness.

We have now worked with over 400 families created through donor conception and surrogacy in 30 different countries and we know that parents (and surrogates/egg donors) are often overwhelmed with information and do not know where to start or who to trust.  Our role at Brilliant Beginnings is to help them build families not just legally, ethically and responsibly, but also with the right information from the start and the practical back up.  Surrogacy is a sensitive exercise in human collaboration and those involved need advice, information and support before they go into a surrogacy arrangement.

Brilliant Beginnings will offer ‘first port of call’ advice to intended parents on all the global options, recommending safe existing providers in the UK and abroad, and providing honest information about the risks, costs and implications of international surrogacy. It will also offer professional matching of parents and egg donors/ surrogates in the UK, with practical and emotional support for parents, donors and surrogates throughout, and management of US surrogacy arrangements to help parents work with reputable agencies and professionals and manage all the UK requirements.

We want to raise awareness among women who may be willing to help create families through surrogacy and egg donation, and make the process easier for them, giving their life-changing gift the recognition it deserves.

And we want to improve law and practice.  There have been some positive steps forward in recent years which we have been proud to be involved in – such as the introduction of maternity leave for parents through surrogacy and the review of the HFEA guidance on surrogacy. But there is more to do. We want to see intended parents recognised as legal parents from birth where the surrogate mother consents. We want to see more honesty about the UK’s approach to payments for surrogacy, given that the reality is that the UK does allow commercial surrogacy.  We want to see an end to discrimination against single intended parents. And we want to make a practical difference to the experience of children born into these arrangements on the ground.

Please support us by getting in touch or helping to spread the word.  You can also follow Brilliant Beginnings on Twitter or stay up to date by reading the Brilliant Beginnings blog.

UK woman conceives with dead husband’s sperm abroad

August 21st, 2013

The press has reported the case of a UK woman who has won permission from the HFEA to have her deceased husband’s sperm exported abroad for IVF treatment after his death.  You can read more about the story here.

How does UK law work on post-death use of sperm?

The rules in the UK are clear – there must be written (and signed) consent from the sperm provider allowing the post death use of his sperm in treatment.  In this case, the man’s sperm was extracted surgically after he was already in a coma he never recovered from.  His wife therefore did not have the written signed consent she needed for treatment to take place in the UK, although she maintained that IVF was always their plan and that Mr H would have wanted her to have a child in these circumstances.

How did Mrs H get permission to use Mr H’s sperm?

In the absence of being able to conceive through IVF in the UK, another option was to export the sperm to another destination where the consent rules were not so stringent.  There is tight regulation of the circumstances in which sperm can be exported, and Mrs H therefore had to seek a ‘special direction’ from the HFEA giving her permission to do it.  She was given that permission and this enabled her to export her husband’s sperm and undergo fertility treatment abroad.  She is currently awaiting pregnancy test results.

Why is this a ‘ground-breaking’ case and did Mrs H break the law?

This case marks the first occasion that the HFEA, under such circumstances, has awarded a ‘special direction’ without the intervention of the court.  Having followed in the footsteps of the well know case of Diane Blood (who successfully won the right, through the Court of Appeal, to export her deceased husband’s sperm abroad – leading to the birth of two children), the HFEA undoubtedly considered the principles of that case and what it said about the need to consider the human rights of all those involved.  The decision over whether to give a special direction is discretionary and something for the HFEA to assess individually in each particular case. Previous cases do not create a formal precedent, but they are influential.

Mrs H therefore did not break the law, having sought permission as the law required her to do, and having been given it.  We congratulate her resolve and wish her the very best in conceiving.

There is more information about the law on the storage and use of gametes here.

 

High Court decision in three new international surrogacy cases

August 20th, 2013

The High Court’s main surrogacy judge, Mrs Justice Theis, has made her decisions in three new international surrogacy cases public, something she only does if she is considering a new issue (to give guidance) or if she wants to draw attention to something which is in the public interest.

The three new decisions all concern foreign commercial surrogacy cases and continue the long trend of the UK court authorising foreign surrogacy arrangements retrospectively. There is no cause for intended parents to be alarmed.

The first two cases – Re PM (2013) and Re C (2013), both US surrogacy cases – deal with the question of payments. The High Court already has a consistent history of ‘authorising’ payments for foreign surrogacy in order to make the child legally a member of his or her UK family, since the very first case (involving a Ukrainian commercial surrogacy arrangement) in which this was done in 2008. However, until now the focus has been on the payments going to the surrogate mother. Theis J has now made it clear that the court also needs to consider what payments have been made to the third party intermediaries who brokered the arrangement (in these two cases, US surrogacy agencies). If these payments include an element of profit for the agency, they will also need the court’s authorisation before a parental order can be made. In practice, this will not affect the likelihood of UK parents being successful in their application (since the welfare of their child will always take priority) but it means that the court will need even more detailed information about the breakdown of payments made for foreign surrogacy before it can reach a final decision.

The third case (AB v DE (2013), also confusingly reported as Re C (2013), in which we represented the parents) is the first Russian surrogacy case to be considered by the UK court. Mrs Justice Theis has published her decision to set out the law and how things are working on the ground in Russia. She also considered some tricky factual issues specific to the particular case. Any parents considering surrogacy in Russia may find the case useful, and lawyers representing them in the UK or in Russia may want to pay heed.

There is more information about international surrogacy on our website.

 

NGA quoted in Sunday Times feature on co-parenting

August 15th, 2013

Nicola was quoted in the Sunday Times article this weekend about co-parenting, commenting on the legal issues for parents considering conceiving with someone they are not in a relationship with.  The weekend piece focused on a single woman, Charlotte, and her hope to start a family with a like-minded man.  Charlotte explains how, at 41, she feels her time is running out to have a baby and that she alone cannot afford to raise a child.  She is looking for a man she is not in a romantic relationship with, who will share parenting care, financial responsibility and decision making with her.

Nicola was asked to comment on our experience as legal experts in co-parenting, and what Charlotte – and others like her – should think about before going into such an arrangement.  She said:  “We have seen a lot of success stories since we started providing co-parenting agreements.  We advise people to think carefully about things like where everyone will live, what each person’s role is, how they will be known to the child and to others, and how the financial responsibility is to be shared.”

At NGA, we have seen co-parenting become a much more mainstream family building option for both single people and same sex couples over the past few years.  There are websites, including Pride Angel, designed specifically as a forum for hopeful co-parents to meet and discuss their parenting plans.  Some arrangements work incredibly well, but some do break down, and where they do this is often because there were mismatched expectations at the outset.

The key to ensuring a successful match and future arrangement is to have detailed discussions at the outset about the legal position and role of every individual (bearing in mind particularly that these arrangements often involve more than two parents – a situation the law is not adequately set up to cater for).  The preparation of agreements confirming everyone’s intentions (even if they are not legally binding) is often a very helpful tool in setting solid foundations and ensuring that everyone is in harmony before a child is conceived.

You can read the Sunday Times article in full here.  There is more information on the legal aspects of co-parenting on our website.  If you would like advice or to put an agreement in place, do get in touch.