UK surrogacy laws are unfair, says MP today in Parliament

Natalie Gamble Associates leaflet on top of coloured balls_bJohn Healey MP (the former Shadow Secretary of State for Health) spoke clearly and compellingly in the House of Commons this afternoon about the need for proper maternity leave and pay for mothers through surrogacy in the UK (you can watch John Healey’s speech in full here). Introducing a Ten Minute Rule motion, he told Parliament about his constituents, surrogate mother Amy Bellamy and her cousin Jane Kassim.  They came to see him at his surgery having been “stunned” to discover that Jane had no legal right to maternity leave or maternity pay to care for the twin daughters Amy had carried for her after Jane was told at 15 that she could never bear children.

We, and Surrogacy UK, are proud to have supported today’s important landmark, the first time this issue has been properly raised in Parliament.  As we know so well, for parents who have struggled to build their families through surrogacy (often after a long and difficult journey of infertility), the lack of basic rights to care for their newborn baby can feel like the final insult.  It makes no sense and has never been a policy decision; just a gap in the law which has not been addressed.  But it is important, as the current position leaves children born through surrogacy in the UK without the legal protection afforded to other children born to their mothers or adopted.

As well as talking about maternity rights as the urgent first step needed, John highlighted some of the wider problems with UK surrogacy law which need addressing, including:

the parents not being named on their child’s birth certificate,

problems dealing with the child’s medical treatment,

delays in the court system to reassign parenthood, and

the absolute veto the surrogate and her husband hold, no matter what is in the child’s best interests.

The UK’s surrogacy laws were designed in 1990.  After 22 years we live in a much changed world, with more children born through surrogacy and a much more sophisticated understanding of families created in unusual ways.  The law on surrogacy was not reviewed properly when Parliament had a chance in 2008 and is overdue for review.  John drew attention to other models of surrogacy law, including pre birth orders, which have been much more successful in dealing with surrogacy arrangements in certain US States, and which the UK should look to.

What was said in Parliament?

“Unlike other mothers, Jane is entitled – having her baby through a surrogate mother – to only 13 weeks parental leave unpaid, and then only entitled to it when she and her husband have a parental order in place.  That means that for mothers like Jane, they are faced with the choice of going back to work very quickly or indeed giving up their jobs entirely.  Today is a day when I hope this House will take the first step in closing this legal loophole.

“As the leading lawyer in this field says:  The conditions for a parental order do not place the child’s welfare first, and ultimately children born through surrogacy do not have the same protection as other children to the time to bond with their parents in the early months of life.  That is from Natalie Gamble, a leading legal expert in this field and one who has conducted more cases and seen through more parental orders than any other lawyer in the country.

“There are probably around 100 babies born through surrogacy each year, but the number is growing as society is changing and science is advancing.  Surely there must be a good case for Britain, like some States in the US, to have a system of pre birth orders.  But the first and most important step is to secure basic maternity rights.  So that mothers like Jane who have their children born through surrogates have the same rights as any other mothers who give birth themselves or indeed who adopt children.

“It is wrong that thousands of mothers who have their own babies or who adopt have a legal right to 39 weeks maternity pay and up to 52 weeks maternity leave, while others have a right to only  13 weeks parental leave unpaid.  It is wrong that such parents cannot put their names on their children’s birth certificate, they cannot make decisions about  medical treatment for their children until they have a formal parental order in place.  It is wrong that such a legal step can be blocked completely by the surrogate mother or her husband; and wrong that it may take months, if a magistrates court is busy, to get that order in place.  Above all it is wrong that mothers like Jane are denied the same basic rights to the time they need together with their newborn babies that other mothers have.

“Amy simply wanted Jane to have the same joy as a mother as she had with her own son Archie.  Together they make a very powerful case for legal change.  This is their campaign and I hope this House will back them today.”

What next?

The Bill proceeded unopposed and was formally listed for a second reading, although in practice it is rare for Ten Minute Rule Bills to be given sufficient Parliamentary time to become law.  However, a cross party group of MPs will now meet with the Minister for Employment to press for government-led change.  We will continue to support this however we can and if you want to get involved or can help with case studies, please do contact us.

Woman’s Hour today

Natalie was also interviewed on this morning’s BBC Radio 4 Woman’s Hour, following a discussion on the lack of maternity leave rules for surrogacy which Natalie contributed to back in 2009, and updating the programme on what was happening today.  You can listen to Natalie on today’s Woman’s Hour here.

More information

Find out more about why we think surrogacy law needs reviewing.

Find out more about our campaigning work.

Find out more about surrogacy law.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,